Clean Reliable Water for the Region
Making the Santa Ana Watershed Work for You
![]() |
The Santa Ana River is the largest coastal river system in Southern California. The river begins high in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows over 100 miles southwesterly where it discharges to the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. The Santa Ana River watershed, which receives an average annual rainfall of about 13 inches, covers over 2650 square miles of widely-varying terrain. This area, which includes parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, is home to more than 4.5 million people. |
Under natural conditions the river would be an intermittent
stream with high run-off in the winter and spring seasons, and with little or no flow in
the summer months. In more recent years the natural river supply has been, and still is,
supplemented by highly-treated effluent flows from wastewater treatment plants resulting
in a perpetual stream of water that courses from the City of San Bernardino to the coastal
plain of Orange County. As the river and its tributaries flow toward the sea, the water
percolates into the sands and gravels of the stream system, recharging the 35 groundwater
basins that comprise the watershed. Water is pumped by farmers and cities from the
groundwater source and utilized for agricultural, municipal and industrial supply.
Following municipal and industrial use, the water is returned to the river as effluent.
The river has a large volume of highly treated effluent and is perhaps the most tightly
regulated in the world. However, each use of the supply results in added salinity to the
water for the next user. The quality of the effluent returned to the River is closely
controlled by the California Water Resources Control Board and the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board to assure that the water supply is protected for downstream
beneficial uses.
Goal Drought Self Sufficiency
Over the last thirty years, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its member agencies Eastern Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utility Agency, Orange County Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, and Western Municipal Water District have been leaders in planning and dealing with the complex problems involved in watershed management. Their efforts have led to significant projects involving water conservation and clean up of contamination. In order to continue that tradition of leadership, SAWPA is proposing a regional program to assure a sustainable water supply for the future, while at the same time enhancing the environment. The goal of the program is to make the region entirely self sufficient during drought cycles, thereby firming up the regions ability to assure a stable economy, while improving water quality, and also allowing more of the States scarce water resources to be allocated to wildlife and agriculture during those times. | ![]() |
California is in the process of dealing with two major water supply issues. CAL FED is a process designed to help the state balance environmental, municipal supply and agricultural water needs in the Bay Delta. SAWPA expects this program to support the CAL FED process by reducing the needs of urban southern California especially during dry years, and thereby enhances the ability of the CAL FED parties to reach agreement. The second major issue is the requirement of the Department of Interior that California develop a plan to reduce its use of Colorado River water from 5.2 million acre feet per year (AFY) to 4.4 million AFY. Implementation of the SAWPA plan will reduce drought year demand in Southern California by 400,000 AFY. This dry-year savings will help to achieve the 4.4 million AFY objective.
Major ComponentsSteel and concrete are not the only important aspects of the water business. In the Santa Ana River a non-native species Arundo donax (giant cane) has come to dominate some 10,000 acres of riparian habitat. Some native species do not prosper in the environment created by this Arundo. The giant cane is also a significant fire hazard, and has cost millions of dollars and ravaged the environment each time it burns. The native flora typically take much longer to grow, are much less dense and after each fire the Arundo expands its grip on the environment. From the perspective of water supply, most observers estimate that if the Arundo were removed and replaced with native species, some 10,000 Acre Feet (AF) of water per year could be saved. One respected University of California scientist estimates that 37,000 AF of water per year could be saved. Protecting habitat enhances water supply in other ways. Examples include the use of open space to percolate water into the ground, or creating wetlands that clean water while preserving habitat. Projects restoring native habitat and creating wetlands or open space, which can be used for many purposes, have been developed by many agencies in this region. SAWPA envisions expanding these activities with a long-term program designed to specifically manage, expand and improve the habitat in the region, while at the same time obtaining a benefit for wildlife, water quality and self-sufficiency. | ![]() |
Conservation and Water Efficiency
The Santa Ana region has long been a leader in water conservation. SAWPAs member agencies have spent millions of dollars promoting and implementing best management practices. More water is recycled in this region of California than in any other comparable area in the United States. There remains more to be done. It is imperative that any plan include a commitment to implement fully the best management practices of the industry and further to remain a leader in seeing that all forms of water conservation are practiced. This includes the implementation of programs to insure that proper landscaping practices are used, public education and storm water management and capture. The estimated cost of this program over the next twenty years is $2 billion dollars over and above the cost of normal pipeline replacement and water treatment. Initial funding of the program will come from local, regional, State, and Federal funds. The funding of the program is designed to be an ongoing process. Each phase of the program will be supplemented by the preceding phase. SAWPA has obtained loans of the funds necessary to get started. Agencies in the local communities will repay the loans by purchasing the water. Any return on investment will be returned to SAWPA where that money will be used to build the next project. This process will continue until the region reaches a point where all the groundwater basins are appropriately managed and enough water is stored so that during drought, no imported water is required (often called conjunctive use). The region has taken major steps toward the goal of sustainability. A $100 million brine disposal system has been built to take salts to the ocean. Four desalters will be operational within the next two years. Major clean-up efforts have been started in virtually every part of the region. Funding has come in from many sources and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is committed to funding up to $5 million per year for regional projects for the next 20 years. Local agencies from all corners of the watershed have invested hundreds of millions of dollars and are poised to make even greater investments. The key issue is financing and policy resolution. The benefits of these projects must be clearly defined through a consensus building process among stakeholders to create policy support parallel to financial support. The projects make financial sense and local agencies must pay the lions share of the cost, but the projects can only be financed when partially subsidized by parties looking at region-wide and statewide benefits. The partial subsidy needed indicates that the agencies in this region will not need to seek additional imported water in a drought. A more detailed list of funding needs is attached, and the funding sources are generally outlined below. The proposed program will cost $2.0 billion above the normally expected pipeline and treatment costs. The proposed local share of the program will be about $1.3 billion or 65%. The way the process is intended to operate, the water agencies will be required to pay for the cost of water developed at a rate higher than the cost any given agency would normally pay, but in return would be supporting the regional program to clean up the water and develop a sustainable system. This could increase the average water bill less than 1% per year ( or by a total of 15 to 20%) phased in over the 20 year life of this plan. The parallel step to the above funding mechanism is to obtain additional funding from the MWD to subsidize these and other related projects in the future. MWD has agreements in place that support the Arlington Desalter, Chino Basin Desalter, Menifee Desalter and numerous water reclamation projects. This amounts to a commitment of about $5 million per year. SAWPA has had preliminary discussions with MWD and the objective is to obtain an additional $6 million per year in funding over the next twenty years to allow additional projects to move ahead. Several other projects have been proposed for the watershed and MWD is evaluating their value at the present time. The next step in the process is to develop additional desalting, groundwater storage (sometimes referred to as conjunctive use), a program to manage the habitat and further conservation measures. SAWPA is proposing that $350 million in a proposed California state bond be allocated to the Santa Ana Region to develop the several basin clean up, groundwater storage and habitat mitigation projects. Some of these projects may develop some additional revenue, which can return to SAWPA for future project subsidies. There are several instances where federal help could be vital. Staff is working with the Bureau of Reclamation to get the exact details of a proposed Southern California water reclamation plan. The proposed plan will be included in the Bureaus report to Congress on water reclamation in Southern California. This is the primary funding source needed to complete the puzzle of funding for recycling wastewater. Initial contacts with the Corp of Engineers have been made and show promise towards allowing their part of the plan to move ahead.The ChallengeThe principal challenge facing everyone in the region is not technical, but to bring competing interests into alignment so that we can all envision a future where the water resources we leave to our children and grandchildren are well managed, of high quality and adequate to meet their needs. All stakeholders whether they be cities, businesses, regulators, farms or wildlife and the environment must have their needs addressed for us to be successful. |
Proposed Project Funding Sources
Proposed California State Bond Projects
Project Name | State Bond Request ($ millions) |
Total Cost ($ millions) |
Chino Basin Clean-up and Conjunctive Use | 150 |
250 |
Orange County Ground Water Replenishment | 63 |
154 |
South Perris Desalter | 25 |
169 |
San Jacinto/Lake Elsinore Watershed Improvement | 35 |
37 |
San Bernardino High Groundwater Pump Out | 20 |
20 |
San Bernardino Basin Conjunctive Use | 0 |
140 |
Riverside Colton Basin Conjunctive Use | 20 |
27 |
Santa Ana River Corridor Open Space | 12 |
12 |
Santa Ana River Water Resources and Habitat Enhancement | 40 |
40 |
Santa Ana River Wetlands Development | 20 |
20 |
Santa Ana River Watershed Flood Control-Water Conservation Projects | 20 |
20 |
Total | 405 | 889 |
Project Name |
Amount Needed in Millions |
Etiwanda Basin Improvements | 2 |
RP-1 Southwest Basin | 0.16 |
Ely Basin Reverse Osmosis and Recharge | 20 |
Carbon Canyon WRF Phase 2-5 | 20 |
RP-1/RP-4 Distribution | 18 |
RP-1/RP-4 North Distribution | 28 |
CCWRF Mission Linen Line | 5 |
Orange County Reclamation | 89 |
Western Municipal Water District Reclamation | 53 |
San Bernardino Reclamation | 94 |
EMWD Reclamation | 95 |
Storage of Imported Water in Seven Oaks | 20 |
Baseline Feeder | 25 |
San Bernardino High Groundwater Phase II | 20 |
SAR Recharge Enhancement Projects | 32 |
SARI Upstream Relocation | 1 |
SARI Downstream Protection | 35 |
Seismic Hazard Analysis, Design | 30 |
Western Elsinore Valley Desalter | 16 |
Wetlands Development Phase II | 20 |
Habitat Restoration | 30 |
Manure Removal and Recycling | 50 |
Total | 703.16 |
Original Graphics SAWPA GIS Copyright 1998
Photography Courtesy of Orange County Water District and US Geological Survey
For more information on any of the programs of funing proposals Email SAWPA